Is it just me or is anyone else bothered by Obama's repeated phrase, "tax cuts that were not paid for"?
How can a man with no understanding of basic economics be our president? Or does he have an understanding of basic economics but it does not serve his agenda? I choose the latter. He wants to build a large, powerful federal government, period, end of story. He has stated that he wants to "fundamentally change America" and he has talked contemptuously about the Constitution on more than one occasion - even chastising the Supreme Court during the State of the Union (like an immature teenage blaming others for their lack of accomplishment).
I encourage all of you to study the JFK, Reagan and Bush tax cuts; specifically look at revenue. What happened to revenue to the federal government when these tax cuts were implemented?
The Lost Art of Critical Thinking and Common Sense in Politics and Public Policy
