What About the Baby?

In commemoration of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling, President Obama said the following yesterday. 

"Today, as we reflect on the 41st anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, we recommit ourselves to the decision's guiding principle: that every woman should be able to make her own choices about her body and her health.  We reaffirm our steadfast commitment to protecting a woman's access to safe, affordable health care and her constitutional right to privacy, including the right to reproductive freedom.  And we resolve to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, and continue to build safe and healthy communities for all our children.  Because this is a country where everyone deserves the same freedom and opportunities to fulfill their dreams."

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Something is missing. Did you catch it?

What about the baby’s choices about his/her body?

What about the baby’s access to safe, affordable health care?

What about the baby’s constitutional right to LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?

What about the baby’s right to be born?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

When you read between the lines, what you see is a very sick and twisted perspective on life:

“We resolve to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies”

By killing all unwanted babies?

                                                    

We will “build safe and healthy communities”

By killing off millions of babies and instilling a sense of irresponsibility on the part of sexually active men and woman?

“This is a country where everyone deserves the same freedom and opportunities to fulfill their dreams”

Unless you are an unborn baby in the womb of a women who does not want you!

The fact that these obvious omissions are not even called out in a mainstream manner, says more about the decline of morals in America than anything I can imagine short of executing undesirables – i.e. Nazy Germany.

http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/craig-bannister/obama-we-recommit-ourselves-roe-v-wades-guiding-principle

I Don't Have Enough Faith to be Pro-Choice

I write this as an aid to Pro-Life advocates who are afraid to voice their opinion when face-to-face with proponents of abortion.

The easiest way to show even the staunchest pro-abortion advocate the errors of their way is to ask lots of questions.

Below are a few examples:

#1 - Do you agree with the following phrase from The Declaration of Independence: "we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"?  

• Key points: When does life begin? Who protects the baby? If you can get them to define that, then we should protect the baby's right to liberty, freedom and pursuit of happiness from that point forward. The reason we have laws against murder is because, as a society, we believe life has innate (intrinsic) value and, therefore, must be protected. How does the mere consent of the mother change the innate (intrinsic) value of the little human being inside her?  .     

#2 - Do you believe a mother should be granted "the choice" to kill their 3-year old child? 2-year old? 1-year old? Six-month-old? One-day old? One-minute old? 

• Key point: Of course they will answer "No" to all choices. After all that would be murder! 

#3 - At what point does the mother have "the choice" to kill a fetus?

1. Any time before live birth?
2. Up until the heart beat is present?
3. The 1st trimester?
4. 2nd trimester?
5. Up until it can survive outside the womb? 

• Key point: Wherever they draw the line, ask them to explain how they arrived at that response. Keep in mind that it is arbitrary. 

#4 - Ask them if they support partial birth abortion, a procedure where the fetus is pulled feet first by the abortionist until the back of the head is visible at which point the abortionists jams a pair of scissors into the baby's skull, the scissors are then opened to enlarge the hole while a suction catheter is inserted into the hole and the child's brains are sucked out causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed. 

• Key point: Anyone who supports this procedure is sick. If that isn't murder, nothing is.

#5 - Ask them to explain why they responded the way they did to that question to #4.

• Key point: It is important for pro-abortionists to articulate their stances. Most have never been challenged. The intellectual exercise of defending their position is often enough to get them to think twice. 

#6 – Ask them if they believe water-boarding should be banned as an interrogation technique for terrorist suspects. Ask them to explain their answer.

• Key point: For those who answer "Yes" to the question, if they are intellectually honest, they will begin to see the arbitrary lines they have been drawing to support their political and ethical positions. 

#7 – Ask them if they are opposed to a state or federal law that requires all women seeking an abortion to receive a sonogram examination or a mandatory waiting period prior to the abortion procedure. Ask them to explain why or why not.

• Key point: Here we get to the heart of the issue. If they answer "No", you are dealing with someone unwilling to even consider protecting life. All you can hope for is that they realize how zealous their support for abortion is given that they will not even give the mother a chance to reconsider. 

#8 - Ask them if your tax dollars should be used to perform abortions? If they answer "Yes", ask them if we can use half of those dollars or get matching funds to educate the woman about their options (adoption or keep the baby).

• Key point: See #7. 

In the end, you will find that the intellectual gymnastics required to be a proponent of abortion are quite extraordinary. The arbitrary lines in the sand, the numerous definitions of when life begins, the emotional "rights-of-the-mother" and "the-government-has-no-right-to-tell-a-woman-what-to-do-with-their-body" arguments all serve to muck up the argument. They conveniently forget the rights of the baby. 

Finally, if given the opportunity to express why you are Pro-Life, I would like to offer a couple of simple responses. 

#1 - I believe life begins at conception and, therefore, it should be protected like any other life. The reason I believe life begins at conception is because, at the moment of conception, something was created where nothing was before. That something is a human life. Human life should be valued above all else and we should do everything we can to protect it. 

#2 -  “If it is acceptable to take the life of an innocent human being on one side of the birth canal, why forbid it on the other? A 7-inch journey cannot miraculously transform a ‘nonhuman tissue mass’ into a valuable human being.” Gregory Koukl 

Do not get sucked into an argument about government involvement or the woman's right to their own body. This is not of legislative argument but one of the heart. Your goal is to simply make them explain their positions and, hopefully, stir something in their heart to reconsider their position.

Good luck.